Cryptographic Hash Algorithm: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus robopagex.com
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Zeile 48: Zeile 48:
 
  - Stamp
 
  - Stamp
 
  '''Proof of ?!'''
 
  '''Proof of ?!'''
 +
 +
FIPS-180-2
 +
 +
GPU is faster than CPU for SUMHASH
 +
 +
mkpasswd?!
 +
 +
openssl speed sha256 vs sha512
 +
 +
key derivation functions
 +
Schlüsselableitungsfunktion
 +
check argon2 pack!

Version vom 7. Dezember 2021, 16:18 Uhr

SHA Algorithm

Performance
SHA256
Weniger Traffic, Speicherplatz, schneller bei 32 Bit CPU
A SHA256 is always 256 bits long, equivalent to 32 bytes, or 64 bytes in an hexadecimal string format.
SHA512
Schneller bei 64 Bit CPU
As the name implies, it's 512 bits, that is 64 bytes.
But that's the hash, maybe you're wondering about a specific representation of that hash in string, as is commonly used, then it depends of the given representation.
If you write the hash in hexa, then it will be 128 characters.
If you write the hash in base64, then it will be 86 bytes (or 88 with padding).
Key generator tools
SSH
OpenSSL
GnuPG
OpenPGP
HowTo PGP
PGP
Authentication Methods
Single-Factor/Primary Authentication
Two-Factor Authentication (2FA)
Single Sign-On (SSO)
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
Password Authentication Protocol (PAP)
Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP)
Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)
Certificate-based authentication
Biometric authentication
Token-based authentication
4 Wege Auth
- Key
- Pass
- MSG
- Device
Lab
- Hash
- Key
- Linked_Time
- Stamp
Proof of ?!

FIPS-180-2

GPU is faster than CPU for SUMHASH

mkpasswd?!

openssl speed sha256 vs sha512

key derivation functions Schlüsselableitungsfunktion check argon2 pack!